Na fb krąży ciekawy tekst firmowany profilem Roberta Kiyosakiego.
In 2000, Saddam Hussein did something interesting. Started selling Iraqi oil in euros instead of dollars. Three years later, we invaded. Found no weapons of mass destruction. But we did find something: Iraqi oil started trading in dollars again. Weird coincidence. 2009, Gaddafi proposed a gold-backed currency for Africa. Called it the dinar. Would've let African countries buy oil without using dollars. 2011, NATO intervened in Libya for "humanitarian reasons." Gaddafi's dead. The gold dinar? Dead too. Libyan oil? Back to dollars. Another coincidence. I'm noticing a pattern. In 1971, Nixon killed the gold standard. Dollar backed by nothing but a promise. Should've collapsed immediately. Didn't. Three years later, Kissinger cut a deal with the Saudis: "Sell your oil only in dollars. We'll keep you in power." Suddenly every country on earth needs dollars to buy energy. That's not monetary policy. That's a protection racket. And it works beautifully as long as the military can enforce it. Russia demands rubles for gas? Sanctions and escalation. Syria wants a pipeline priced in euros? Civil war intensifies, pipeline never happens. Iran tries to sell oil outside the dollar system? Decades of sanctions. I'm not saying these are good or bad governments. I'm saying watch what happens when anyone threatens the petrodollar. The pattern isn't subtle once you see it. SWIFT isn't a neutral payment system. It's a weapon. You get cut off from SWIFT, you can't participate in global trade. Russia, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela—all threatened dollar dominance in some way. All got cut off. They don't teach this in school because it's uncomfortable. We don't send 18-year-olds to die for "freedom." We send them to maintain reserve currency status. Currency funds the military. Military protects the currency. Britain learned this the hard way. Pound sterling was the world's reserve currency for 200 years. Lost it after World War II. British Empire collapsed within two decades. Same cycle. Every empire in history. Dutch guilder, British pound, now the dollar. Ray Dalio's been screaming about this: we're in the late stage. Military overextended, currency weakening, rivals building alternatives. China's Belt and Road isn't about helping poor countries. It's about creating debt relationships denominated in yuan. BRICS aren't talking about a new currency because they're friends. They're building an exit ramp from dollar dependency. When the dollar loses reserve status—not if, when—the ability to print money without consequences disappears. Then the military contracts. Then the empire ends. You can call this cynical. I call it financial history. Every war in my lifetime had a currency angle if you knew where to look. "Freedom and democracy" is marketing. The actual policy documents? Those talk about "maintaining dollar liquidity in global energy markets." I'm not anti-military. I'm anti-bullshit. If we're sending people to fight, at least be honest about why.
Nie jest to osoba którą można łatwo zaszufladkować jako "świr od teorii spiskowych " Nie jest on jedynym, który przedstawia sytuację z tej perspektywy. Nie jest pierwszym.
Do sedna: Dlaczego ten "marketing " o niesieniu wolności i demokracji wciąż działa?
#usa #ropa #ekonomia #wojna
